Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, with an 80.9 score against 75.8. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has the previous 12 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a notably newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and just a little lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a slightly better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a little bit higher pixels density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has 7 more cores and 4 GB more RAM.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a greater camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with higher video frame rate, a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution and a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra have quite similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.