Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.96 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a global score of 80.9, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A30's 79.6 global score. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra construction is way newer than Samsung Galaxy A30's, although it is just a little thicker and heavier. The Galaxy A30 has a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with 7 more cpu cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A30, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a back camera with much more megapixels and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A30 counts with a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features improved battery duration than Galaxy A30, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.