Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.96 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A31 has a global score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's 80.9 overall score. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A31 has older 10 version and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12. Samsung Galaxy A31 is a notably older and a little bit thicker cellphone than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but Samsung was able to make it just a bit lighter anyway.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy A31, because although it has a little less pixels per display inch, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with a bit bigger screen. Galaxy A31 has a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 4 GB less RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
Galaxy A31 has a bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy A31, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and videos, a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera with a way higher resolution.
The Galaxy A31 and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra both have quite similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.