Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.96 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a bit better than Galaxy A5 (2017), with an 80.9 score against 75.8. Although the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is extremely newer than the Galaxy A5 (2017), it's heavier and just a little bit thicker. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a bit better screen than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a just a bit inferior pixel number in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A5 (2017) features a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with more cpu cores. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a back camera with lot more MP and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.