Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, having an 83.8 score against 80.9. Although the Samsung Galaxy A50 is much older than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, it's construction is just a little bit thinner and lighter. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with more cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot more MP back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.