Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, having an 86.6 score against 80.9. The Samsung Galaxy A50s design is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. Both devices we are comparing use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has older 10 version and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a bit lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit bigger display. Galaxy A50s counts with a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
The Galaxy A50s counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50s also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra shoots greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a way better video resolution, a way more mega-pixels back camera, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and videos and a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and pictures.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features longer battery duration than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.