Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, having a global score of 85.5 against 80.9. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version. Although the Galaxy A51 is a lot older than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, it's body is lighter and a little bit thinner.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a little bit worse screen pixels density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with a little bit bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with more cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor, a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low light situations, a back facing camera with a much higher 200 MP resolution and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.