Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is much better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, getting a general score of 90.8 against 80.9. The Galaxy A51 5G is a older and just a little bit thicker cellphone than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but Samsung managed to make it just a little bit lighter anyway. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and they are faster). The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with a little larger screen.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a lot bigger sensor, a larger camera aperture and a much better 200 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera. Galaxy A51 5G has a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.