Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's 80.9 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A52 design has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but it is just a little lighter. Galaxy A52 features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with a bit larger display. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution, a much bigger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a lot better video definition.
Galaxy A52 counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A52, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.