Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, having a overall score of 91.3 against 80.9. Galaxy A52 5G's design has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but it's just a little lighter. These phones include the same Android 12 operating system. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with 7 more cpu cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a little sharper display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit worse number of pixels per inch of screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with a quite larger display. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a very superior camera than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a camera in the back with a way better resolution and a much larger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a bit better battery life than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.