Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a global score of 91.1, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's overall score of 80.9. Samsung Galaxy A52s's design has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but it is just a little lighter. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A52s has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a just a little lower screen density, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with a quite bigger display.
Galaxy A52s has a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A52s also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1 TB. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a much higher video definition, a much better resolution camera and a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a bit better battery life than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.