Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.96 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has an overall score of 80.9, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)'s 75.8 general score. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra design is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)'s, although it's a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. Galaxy A7 (2017) counts with an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a larger screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a just a little greater pixels density. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a F1.9 camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a lot more megapixels back facing camera and a much higher video resolution.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.