Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70, getting a general score of 80.9 against 76.9. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a newer 12 version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10, so it gives you some extra features. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra construction is notably newer, but just a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A70.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a better count of pixels per inch in the display and a same size display. Galaxy A70 features a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with 7 more cores.
Galaxy A70 features much more storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A70 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures and a much better video resolution.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a bit better battery life than Galaxy A70, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.