Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, having a global score of 87.5 against 80.9. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A71 has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12. The Galaxy A71 is an much older cellphone than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but it is a bit thinner and a little bit lighter anyway.
Samsung Galaxy A71 has a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with more cores. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A71. They have a same size screen, the same screen pixel density and exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Galaxy A71 features a much better storage to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A71 also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and video in low light environments, it also counts with a way larger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a back facing camera with a much better 200 MP resolution.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A71, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.