Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, with a 92.9 score against 80.9. The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a a bit lighter phone than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but they are equally thin. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version while Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have a 8 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a higher number of cores (and also faster). The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both of them have the same quantity of pixels per inch of display, the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a display of the same size.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a way higher resolution camera in the back, a way larger back camera sensor taking much better quality pictures and a lot higher video quality.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.