Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.96 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) has an overall score of 85.2, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's overall score of 80.9. The Galaxy A9 (2018) body is a bit lighter and a bit thinner than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a sharper screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a bit better amount of pixels in each display inch, a bit larger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores. The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3800mAh. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures, it also counts with a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures, a lot better 200 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.