Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F41 is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, having a global score of 85.2 against 80.9. Even though the Samsung Galaxy F41 is older and just a little bit thicker than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, it's design is still just a little bit lighter. These phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy F41 has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy F41, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixel quantity in each inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little larger screen and a really brighter screen. Galaxy F41 counts with an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with 7 more CPU cores.
The Galaxy F41 has a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting images in low light situations, it also counts with a lot better video resolution, a back-facing camera with much more MP and a way bigger camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality.
The Galaxy F41 features better battery performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.