Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is way better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's overall score of 80.9. Both phones we are comparing here use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12. Samsung Galaxy Fold is a older and much heavier cellphone than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but Samsung was able to make it somewhat thinner anyway.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher display density. Galaxy Fold has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels, a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a lot better video quality.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.