Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.96 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is slightly better than Galaxy M20, having a global score of 80.9 against 78.9. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra design is notably newer and a little bit thinner than Galaxy M20's, although it's also a bit heavier. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has newer 12 version while Galaxy M20 has Android 10.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy M20 counts with a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 4 GB less RAM, it also counts with 7 more CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy M20's battery lifetime is just as good as the battery duration in Motorola Edge 30 Ultra. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a very superior camera than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a much better 200 MP resolution camera, a way better video definition and a way larger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.