Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Black and Blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.96 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M30 is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, with an 82.4 score against 80.9. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy M30 has newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version, giving some extra features and a performance increase. The Samsung Galaxy M30 construction has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but it's lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 has a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and also faster). Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a quite lower number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy M30 features a much better storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M30 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy M30, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a lot more megapixels back facing camera, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a much bigger sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy M30's battery duration is very similar to the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.