Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.96 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's global score of 80.9. Even though the Samsung Galaxy M51 is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, we must tell that it is also older, thicker and just a little bit heavier. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy M51 has the previous 10 version and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version.
Galaxy M51 counts with a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a little bit more pixels per inch in the display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much better video resolution, a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Galaxy M51 features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy M51 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M51 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has a 7000mAh battery size instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.