Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is a lot better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's overall score of 80.9. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is noticeably older and a little heavier than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, it's body is still just a little bit thinner. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a bit smaller display, a little bit less pixels per inch of screen and a way worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing images and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with a larger sensor providing a higher image quality, a back camera with way more mega pixels and better 30 frames per second video frame rates.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.