Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, having an 81.2 score against 80.9. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version. Galaxy Note 3 is a somewhat lighter phone than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but both have the same thickness.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra and Galaxy Note 3 both feature quite similar displays, although the Galaxy Note 3 has a little bit smaller display, a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a little lower quantity of pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a graphics processing unit and a greater number of cores (and also faster).
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a much higher 200 megapixels resolution back facing camera, a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality photographs and videos, a lot higher video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a slightly better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.