Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.1 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, having an 80.9 score against 79.3. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has 12 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's body is incredibly newer than Samsung Galaxy Note 5's, but it is a bit thicker and heavier.
Galaxy Note 5 features a bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a very superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Note 5 features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Single-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra captures greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a much larger camera sensor, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a much better 200 MP resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a way better battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.