Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.96 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a global score of 80.9, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's overall score of 80.4. Although Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is newer than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it's somewhat heavier and just a little thicker. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little bit lower display pixels density and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a bit more memory to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with more cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra captures greater pictures and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a much larger sensor, a much better video quality and a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.