Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.96 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a score of 80.9, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Note7's 79.5 overall score. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's body is way newer, but just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than Galaxy Note7. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a just a bit lower quantity of pixels per screen inch and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with 3 more cpu cores. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a lot better camera than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a way larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and photographs and a much more mega-pixels camera.
Galaxy Note7 counts with a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 256 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a way better battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.