Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's 80.9 overall score. Galaxy S10e is an older cellphone than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but it's a little thinner and a lot lighter anyway. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with 7 more CPU cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a slightly better display than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bigger display. Galaxy S10e counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy S10e also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a way better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a much tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs in low light environments, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a much more mega pixels back camera and a lot better video quality.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a way better battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.