Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, with a global score of 90.8 against 80.9. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a just a bit lighter cellphone than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but both of them are 0.33inches thick. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12.
Galaxy S20 FE features a much better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a bit worse screen pixels density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with a little bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking photos in low-light environments, it also counts with a much higher video definition, a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.