Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is way better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's 80.9 overall score. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version, providing a couple additional features and performance enhancements. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a way older, somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker phone than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM memory. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a little more vivid display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a quite lower count of pixels per screen inch, a little bit smaller display and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery duration is just as good as the battery duration in Motorola Edge 30 Ultra. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a much better camera than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a way bigger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality photographs and faster 30 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.