Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-09-08 | -- |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 7.00 ounces | -- |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's score of 80.9. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is noticeably thinner and way lighter than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a more vivid display than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a quite bigger display, a higher pixel quantity in each screen inch and much more brightness. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra's processing unit is just as good as Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's processing unit, although the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a larger number of megahertz cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for taking pictures and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, a camera with a 200 mega pixels and the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality pictures.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's battery duration is very similar to Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.