Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Blue and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.96 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a score of 80.9, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S5 Sport's overall score of 77.8. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has older 12 version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. Even though Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is heavier than the Galaxy S5 Sport, it's a little bit thinner and way newer.
The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with 3 more cpu cores and a graphics processor. Galaxy S5 Sport has a little bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a much smaller screen and a bit worse 1920 x 1080px resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixel quantity per display inch.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a greater camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger camera aperture, a lot better 200 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot bigger camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.