Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.0 |
| 2022-09-08 | -- |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | -- |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.96 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 Active has a score of 80.9, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's score of 80.9. The Galaxy S6 Active body is just a little thicker but a lot lighter than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S6 Active has the previous 5.0 version while Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch of display and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. Galaxy S6 Active counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and also faster), a 64-bit CPU and a GPU.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a lot better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot larger sensor providing a much better image quality and a back camera with a much better 200 megapixels resolution.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.