Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, getting a general score of 80.9 against 75.8. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's design is extremely newer and thinner, but just a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S7 Active features an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with more cores.
Galaxy S7 Active has a little bit better display than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a way smaller display and a lot darker screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra captures way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting images in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot better video quality and a lot higher resolution camera. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.