Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, with a overall score of 81.7 against 80.9. The Galaxy S8 design is incredibly lighter and just a little thinner than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, although it was released many years before. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra and Galaxy S8 both have extremely similar displays, because although the Galaxy S8 has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Galaxy S8 counts with a much better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos, a back facing camera with much more megapixels and a lot higher video resolution.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.