Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's 80.9 global score. Samsung Galaxy S9 is a lighter phone than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but both of them have the same thickness. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with 7 more cores.
Galaxy S9 counts with a display that's just as good as Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's display, because although the Galaxy S9 has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels amount in each inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a lot smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a way better resolution camera, a much larger camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a much higher video definition.
The Galaxy S9 has a better memory to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 400 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.