Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.96 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has an overall score of 80.9, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's overall score of 80.1. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a extremely newer phone, and it's also notably lighter and incredibly thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has the previous 12 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with 7 more CPU cores. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a display that is very similar to Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's screen, because although the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater amount of pixels per display inch.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking images in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a camera with a way better 200 MP resolution, a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality photos and videos.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a greater storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.