Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's overall score of 80.9. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version. Even being the best device in this comparison, it must be noted that it's also a lot older, a bit heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a bit lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little larger screen. Galaxy XCover Pro has more memory for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 200 mega pixels resolution, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a way bigger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and pictures.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has better battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.