Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, with a global score of 88.5 against 80.9. Galaxy Z Flip's design is somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, even though it was released many years before. These phones work with the same Android 12 OS (Operating System), so both should provide very similar OS features.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater number of cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little bit worse pixels density and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, they both have a display with the same size.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photos or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much better video quality, a lot larger sensor which provides a much better image and video quality and a much better 200 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.