Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's score of 80.9. These phones use Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is extremely older than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, it's design is thinner and just a little bit lighter.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have a 8 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 7 more CPU cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, they both have a screen of the same size.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much higher video quality, a way larger sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.