Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, getting a global score of 94.6 against 80.9. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 2 is older and extremely heavier than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, it's body is still thinner. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has 7 more cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixels quantity in each inch of screen.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting images or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot better video resolution and a lot more megapixels camera.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.