Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's 80.9 global score. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the older 10 version while Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's construction is older, just a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a brighter display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Both of them have a same size display, the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with more cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a greater camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a back camera with a much better 200 megapixels resolution, a much higher video resolution and a much bigger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's battery lifetime is just as good as Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's battery performance, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a 0 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.