Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a global score of 80.9, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's 79 global score. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a newer cellphone, and it is also a little lighter and a little thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has newer 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version, so it provides you a couple nice extra features and better performance.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both have a same size display, an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and the same pixel density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with more cpu cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a much larger sensor providing a lot better image quality. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a battery performance that is very similar to the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra one, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a 0 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.