Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-27 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.28 x 2.92 x 0.27 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ SM7325-AE (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is better than the Motorola Edge 30, having an 87.1 score against 72.6. The LG Velvet body is older, thicker and heavier than Motorola Edge 30. LG Velvet counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Edge 30, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
The LG Velvet has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 30, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The LG Velvet counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet counts with a little better battery life than Motorola Edge 30, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 4020mAh. The LG Velvet captures much better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30, although it has a back facing camera with a lower resolution, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.