Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-04-27 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.28 x 2.92 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ SM7325-AE (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is much better than Motorola Edge 30, getting a global score of 85.5 against 72.6. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 has Android 12. Although the Galaxy A51 is a better device than the Motorola Edge 30, we must note that it's also a much older, somewhat thicker and just a little heavier device.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Edge 30. They have a display of the same size, the same screen pixel density and the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 30, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A51 features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 30, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy A51 features a very superior camera than Motorola Edge 30, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video and a camera in the back with a worse 48 MP resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A51's battery performance is very similar to the Motorola Edge 30 one, although the Samsung Galaxy A51 has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.