Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-04-27 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.28 x 2.92 x 0.27 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ SM7325-AE (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Motorola Edge 30, with a 98.9 score against 72.6. Even being the best phone in this comparison, it must be noted that it's also an older, much heavier and somewhat thicker phone. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version while Motorola Edge 30 has Android 12 version.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better display than Motorola Edge 30, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bigger screen and a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior storage to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 30, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a camera in the back with way more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a little better battery duration than Motorola Edge 30, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.