Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-09-14 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo's 77 overall score. The Apple iPhone X is a noticeably older and a little heavier cellphone than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, but Apple was able to build it just a little thinner anyway. Apple iPhone X counts with a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has 2 less processing cores (but faster) and 5 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a little bit better display than iPhone X, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a way brighter display and a little larger display. The iPhone X counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because it has more internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a better camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and photos and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a really longer battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.