Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-09-14 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, having a general score of 82 against 77. Despite being the best we are comparing here, the Apple iPhone XR is a noticeably older, heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo. The iPhone XR has a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 2 less cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a bit sharper display than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit better display pixels density, way more brightness and a quite larger screen. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a much better camera than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a lot better resolution back camera and a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a much bigger memory for applications and games than Apple iPhone XR, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a very superior battery life than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.