Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 13 | Android 5.0 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, with a 77.7 score against 77. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but HTC One M9 has an older 5.0 version and Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13. The HTC One M9 is a way older and thicker phone than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, but HTC managed to make it just a bit lighter anyway.
The HTC One M9 counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a really smaller display and a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher count of pixels in each screen inch. The HTC One M9 counts with a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 8 cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics co-processor and a 64 bits CPU.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels, a bigger aperture and a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.