Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-09-14 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 is a bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, getting a general score of 77.6 against 77. The HTC U11 construction has the same thickness than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, but it is a little lighter. HTC U11 features a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a little sharper display than HTC U11, because although it has a just a little inferior pixel count in each inch in the screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a larger screen. Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with just a bit bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a superior battery duration than HTC U11, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh. Motorola Edge 40 Neo takes much better photographs and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a way better 50 MP resolution back-facing camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.