Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-09-14 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, with a overall score of 81.3 against 77. Although LG V35 ThinQ is notably older than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, it's body is just a little thinner and a bit lighter. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo features just a bit better looking display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit less pixels per display inch and a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a bit larger display. LG V35 ThinQ has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a much larger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a really longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.